
Chiropractic
Headaches from the neck: which kind responds to treatment
Tension-type, cervicogenic and migraine headaches feel similar but respond to different things. How they are told apart, and which respond to neck treatment.
Headaches are one of the more common reasons people book here, and also one of the areas where a clinic can most easily overpromise. So it is worth being direct about it: some headaches respond well to treatment of the neck, and some do not, and the useful part of the first appointment is working out which kind you have.
The three patterns worth telling apart
Tension-type headache is the most common. A dull, pressing, band-like ache across both sides of the head, mild to moderate, without nausea, and not usually made worse by walking up stairs. It can last from half an hour to several days.
Cervicogenic headache comes from the joints, muscles and nerves of the upper neck. The pain starts at the base of the skull and spreads forward, typically over one side and typically the same side every time. Neck stiffness usually comes with it, neck rotation is often reduced, and sustained positions provoke it.
Migraine is a neurological condition rather than a mechanical one. More often one-sided and throbbing, moderate to severe, worsened by ordinary activity, and commonly accompanied by nausea or sensitivity to light and sound. Some people get a visual or sensory aura first.
These are not tidy categories in real life. Plenty of people have more than one type, and a long-standing migraine pattern can develop a neck component over years of guarding. That overlap is exactly why “which headache is this” is a question worth spending time on.
Which ones respond to neck treatment
Cervicogenic and tension-type headaches have reasonable evidence behind manual therapy, specific neck exercise, and addressing the sustained postures and loads that provoke them. That is what the evidence supports — meaningful for a lot of people, and not a guarantee for any individual.
Migraine is different. It responds primarily to medical management — trigger identification, acute medication, and preventive medication where attacks are frequent enough to warrant it. Where treatment of the neck has a role in migraine, it is usually in people who also have a genuine neck contribution, and the realistic aim is reducing one input rather than treating the migraine itself.
If your assessment points at migraine rather than a neck-driven headache, we say so — and where medical management is the right lead, we say so at the assessment. If specialist care is the next step, we’ll provide a detailed letter outlining our findings and recommendations, including the specialist we believe is best suited to your needs — arriving with that letter makes the next conversation a much shorter one.
What the assessment involves
The history does most of the work: where the pain starts, where it travels, one side or both, what it feels like, how long it lasts, what brings it on, what you have to do to cope with it, and what you have already tried. Headache diagnosis is largely a pattern-recognition exercise on that information.
The examination then tests whether the upper neck is a plausible source — joint movement at the top three segments of the neck, muscle tenderness, whether sustained positions or manual pressure reproduce your familiar headache. Reproducing the actual headache is a much stronger signal than finding a tender neck, because tender necks are common in people with no headaches at all.
Imaging has no routine role. Scans are for suspected serious pathology, not for confirming that a neck is stiff.
Headache patterns that need urgent medical care
Most headaches are benign, however unpleasant. These are not:
- A sudden severe headache that reaches maximum intensity within seconds — a “thunderclap” headache
- Headache with fever and a stiff neck
- Headache after a head injury, particularly with drowsiness or vomiting
- Headache with weakness, numbness, slurred speech, vision loss or confusion
- A first severe headache after the age of 50
- A headache that is steadily worsening over days or weeks, or that is worse on waking and with coughing or straining
Any of these means urgent medical assessment, not an appointment next week.
The practitioners here are trained to spot these, and screen for them at every first appointment. If you describe any of them to us, we will tell you the same thing and help you get seen rather than book you in — and for anything that turns out not to be on this list, that is exactly the sort of thing the practitioners here see every day.
What treatment looks like in practice
Hands-on work to the upper neck. Manual joint techniques and soft tissue work to the segments and muscles that testing implicated, not to the neck in general.
Specific exercise. Deep neck flexor and scapular endurance work has some of the better evidence in this area. It is unglamorous, it takes weeks, and it is a large part of why some people stop having headaches and others keep having them.
The provoking loads. How long you hold a position before changing it, screen height, how you sleep, and — genuinely — sleep, stress and caffeine, all of which influence headache frequency more than most people expect. This overlaps heavily with desk-related neck and shoulder pain, which often turns up alongside headaches in the same person.
A word about frequency
Two things worth watching for.
The first is medication-overuse headache. Taking acute pain relief for headaches on more than about ten to fifteen days a month, over months, can itself sustain a headache pattern. It is common and under-recognised, and more hands-on treatment will not resolve it. Tell us if that is the pattern — a medication review is the thing that changes it, and we refer you to your GP with a letter of findings rather than book you in for more visits.
The second is the treatment plan itself. If a neck contribution is present, most people would expect some change within four to six visits over a few weeks. That is a checkpoint, not a promise. Headache care that has run for months without a clear change is worth questioning, and a plan that answers “not working yet” with “more visits” is worth questioning harder.
